Closed russella closed 12 years ago
Hi,
the missing comma was a missing definition ;-)
The output was done by the following definition:
\newbibmacro*{issue+date-parens}{%
\printtext{%
\iffieldundef{issue}%
{\usebibmacro{date}}%
{\printfield{issue}%
\setunit*{\addspace}%
\usebibmacro{date}}%
}\newunit}
As you can see the separator between issue
and date
is a simple \addspace
. To fixed this I will use the following definition:
\newbibmacro*{issue+date-parens}{%
\printtext{%
\iffieldundef{issue}%
{\usebibmacro{date}}%
{\printfield{issue}%
\setunit*{\addcomma\space}%
\usebibmacro{date}}%
}\newunit}
regards Marco
Dear Marco,
It seems that there could be some punctuation missing after "issue" is laid out in the article type. For example, with the entry:
The issue number should probably be separated from the year with a comma.
All the best, Alex