Closed SharmaAntriksh closed 1 year ago
Hi, thank you for reporting this issue. It has been quite some time since I updated the powerquery-parser version and I suspect this is the issue. It has been on my list for some time to make a new maintenance release.
Hopefully I have some time tomorrow to investigate. I will report back as soon as the fix is deployed.
I updated the parser now but this did not fix the issue so I did a little digging in the powerquery language specification. Here are the relevant grammar parts:
table-type:
"table" row-type
row-type:
"[" field-specification-list? "]"
field-specification-list:
field-specification
field-specification "," field-specification-list
field-specification:
optional? field-name field-type-specification?
field-type-specification: //this branch is not relevant
"=" field-type
field-name:
generalized-identifier
quoted-identifier
generalized-identifier:
generalized-identifier-part
generalized-identifier separated only by blanks (U+0020) generalized-identifier-part
generalized-identifier-part:
generalized-identifier-segment
decimal-digit-character generalized-identifier-segment
generalized-identifier-segment:
keyword-or-identifier
keyword-or-identifier dot-character keyword-or-identifier
keyword-or-identifier:
letter-character
underscore-character
identifier-start-character identifier-part-characters
letter-character:
A Unicode character of classes Lu, Ll, Lt, Lm, Lo, or Nl
identifier-start-character:
letter-character
underscore-character
decimal-digit-character: //these are digits and would apply to your number as identifier
A Unicode character of the class Nd
so as I understand it, a generalized-identifier may start with a decimal-digit-character but it must have at least one generalized-identifier-segment after it. So according to the language specification the code that you wrote is not valid. Unfortunately the implementation of the parser in Power-BI differs from the specification. I had several issues of this kind already where code was parsed in Power-BI but was not valid according to spec.
However to solve your problem, we can use the other branch of generalized-identifier-segment: the quote-identifier:
quoted-identifier:
#" text-literal-charactersopt "
it's used to define complex identifiers that do not parse as a normal identifier (for example you can have spaces in there etc.).
It looks like this (note the #"1"
)
let
Source = Table.FromRows(Json.Document(Binary.Decompress(Binary.FromText("Pcy5DcAwDEPRXVS7iZ1MY6jIfcf7dxYVgwWLBwI/Z+kk+EbR8CvaJirZZqq3LdRgW12xVTYK2ylUDgqVk0LlcqVWuSn8D4W9FCofhUoR1Qo=", BinaryEncoding.Base64), Compression.Deflate)), let _t = ((type nullable text) meta [Serialized.Text = true]) in type table [Column1 = _t, Column2 = _t, Column3 = _t]),
GroupedRows =
Table.Group (
Source,
{"Column1"},
{
{
"Transform",
each
Table.PromoteHeaders (
Table.Transpose (
_[[Column2], [Column3]]
)
),
type table [#"1" = text, #"2" = text, #"3" = text, #"4" = text, #"5" = text]
}
}
),
ExpandedCount =
Table.ExpandTableColumn (
GroupedRows,
"Transform",
{"1", "2", "3", "4", "5"},
{"1", "2", "3", "4", "5"}
)
in
ExpandedCount
P.S.: 1b should parse as an identifier, but it does not, this is a bug in @microsoft/powerquery-parser i suspect.
If you define column names as number in type table [] argument then the formatter considers that as an error whereas Power Query doesn't.
Code:
Not a burning issue or something that can't be avoided, but just thought of sharing.