Closed radistoubalidis closed 2 years ago
The CI has failed:
-rw-r--r-- 1 runner docker 1482752 Jun 24 07:01 gcbm_input.db
curl: (26) Failed to open/read local data from file/application
Error: Process completed with exit code 26.
Can you please investigate?
The CI has failed:
-rw-r--r-- 1 runner docker 1482752 Jun 24 07:01 gcbm_input.db curl: (26) Failed to open/read local data from file/application Error: Process completed with exit code 26.
Can you please investigate?
/dynamic
and getting this log locally
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.998630> (info) - Config has files: 7
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999017> (info) - Using Logging Configuration: /app/input/run4/logging.conf
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999066> (info) - Using configurations:
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999079> (info) - localdomain.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999091> (info) - pools_cbm.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999136> (info) - modules_cbm.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999184> (info) - modules_output.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999195> (info) - spinup.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999202> (info) - variables.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999209> (info) - internal_variables.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999216> (info) - Using provider configurations:
<2022-06-24 09:27:51.999223> (info) - provider_config.json
<2022-06-24 09:27:52.029048> (info) - Using operation manager:
<2022-06-24 09:27:52.029184> (info) - spinup ON, sequencer - CBMSpinupSequencer
<2022-06-24 09:27:52.046274> (info) - GCBM version: 1.0.0
<2022-06-24 09:27:52.063944> (fatal) - main(306) - Value too large.
Ah ha! @radistoubalidis - this seems to be a permissions error: https://github.com/iterative/cml/issues/183
I think we have two options:
Ah ha! @radistoubalidis - this seems to be a permissions error: iterative/cml#183
I think we have two options:
* investigate the use of Github Environments to actions from external PRs to run * merge it and test manually, assuming it'll work once integrated with the repository.
@HarshCasper told me that forks don't have access to github.access_token
, that's why the cml-action was working only in my fork.
Update - Regarding github environments we could:
Hi @radistoubalidis I missed your reply sorry.
Your proposed solutions sound great. However given that this is demonstrated to work on your fork, I think it will be ok to merge and review manually.
@HarshCasper WDYT? We could file an issue to configure Github environments in the future, noting that we cannot review PRs that require GHA secrets. I don't think we will have many of these.
Hi @aornugent — I am merging this for now. I have reverted some of the changes that @radistoubalidis made, following you PR review, since it inadvertently broke the entire functionality which was too difficult to fix. I will create a separate issue to track the changes needed and maybe a first-time contributor can pick them up later. I hope that's fine.
In 03832a3 :
I modified CML Action to run the GCBM simulation without using the rest_gcbm_api
.
linux-demo.zip
configuration @aornugent uploaded in https://github.com/moja-global/FLINT.Cloud/pull/165 and interact directly with moja.cli
using docker exec
to run the simulation.The simulation runs smoothly the job fails in the cml step because forks can't publish comments in a PR.
You can see full action output here
PS please make sure to squash merge 😅
Description
Goals
GCBM.CompileResults
tool to the docker imageType of change
How Has This Been Tested?
...
Additional Context (Please include any Screenshots/gifs if relevant)