Closed Boxylmer closed 1 year ago
Thank you very much for catching. Yes, it looks simply failure in stereobond recognition.
up/down bond consistency check seems to be done before flipping stereobonds in the parenthesis. I will fix it in the next patch.
Hi Mojaie!
First and foremost, thank you for putting so much effort into this package, I'm excited to try out some fragmentation ideas we have with the new api and we're finding the changes made to be a lot more intuitive.
When parsing some smiles, we're getting catches with certain molecules that weren't causing errors in 0.13. For example, 1,3-Butadiene, 1,2-dichloro:
ERROR: Invalid diastereomer representation
I'm unsure if this is a real problem as other parsers seem to not complain about it:
Any ideas what might have changed to cause this?
Best, Will.