Open bushjames opened 1 week ago
Tentatively scheduled for discussion 11th September 2024 @ 0900 UTC.
Discussed at DA meeting 2024-09-11 0900 UTC. @MichaelJBRichards presented the issues around using ILPv4 in Mojaloop ISO-20022 API instead of v1 as the move to ISO gives us an opportunity to update to the latest version. CCB likes the idea of using v4 in moja ISO API but is hesitant to update FSPIOP to v4 due to the volume of work required by MMO tech providers to upgrade also.
DA discussed the issues around supporting both v1 and v4 packets across FSPIOP and ISO-20022 APIs and made the following decisions:
(voting members present: @bushjames, @MichaelJBRichards, @PaulGregoryBaker, @vijayg10 , @elnyry-sam-k)
Note that points 1 and 2 above imply that the switch will have to be able to cope with both types to ensure backward compatibility and must be able to determine which should be applied to validate ILP data given the incoming message formats.
Point 2 above shall be discussed in more detail at a later date.
Request Summary:
Note: Part of ISO-20022 workstream.
There are multiple issues to discuss when considering the adoption of ILPv4 in Mojaloop. This ticket serves as a place holder for those discussions and a way of recording DA views, opinions and decisions relating to this and related topics.
Note that ILPv4 is a precursor to native ISO-20022 interface due to the single crypto field available in the proposed spec.
Request Details:
A full impact assessment needs to be done. Note that this change will touch critical code areas and requires very thorough up-front design thinking.
Artifacts:
Dependencies:
Accountability:
Decision(s):