What should be the improvement?
More and more laboratories use inertial sensor for "in lab" / "in field"
studies. They can use their own sensors or commercialised sensors (XSens,
Shimmer, Physilog, APDM, etc.). But in some case, the lack of adapted
visualisation tool can be difficult to understand inertial sensor signals (i.e.
gyroscopes, accelerometers, magnetometers and more). In the save way, having
standard tools for the strapdown integration or calibration could help a lot
some studies.
Could you detail it by giving examples (code, files)?
The idea is to use a similar method than proposed in the C3D file for the force
platform. The IMU channels are stored as simple analog channels and their
configuration are stored in the metadata IMU. As for the force platforms, Mokka
will display IMUs and these channels sorted by category (Accelerometers,
gyroscopes, magnetometers, others). Categorised signals could be displayed in
"Points" chart.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by arnaud.barre on 8 Apr 2013 at 7:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
arnaud.barreon 8 Apr 2013 at 7:37