It seems to me that other than its tools and preferred serialisations, XLIFF is a pretty good, comprehensive format and we should maintain a decent 1:1 mapping with it, if not basically pick all its good parts.
@victoriasoesanto nothing needs to be done about this right now, but let us keep this in mind moving forward: any evolution of the spec should be done only after a careful review of the XLIFF spec.
We should also add mappings to all babelon element to XLIFF, such as xliff:state.
It seems to me that other than its tools and preferred serialisations, XLIFF is a pretty good, comprehensive format and we should maintain a decent 1:1 mapping with it, if not basically pick all its good parts.
@victoriasoesanto nothing needs to be done about this right now, but let us keep this in mind moving forward: any evolution of the spec should be done only after a careful review of the XLIFF spec.
We should also add
mappingsto all babelon element to XLIFF, such asxliff:state.