Closed nlwashington closed 9 years ago
currently, ids for SNOMED are formed like:
SNOMEDCT_2010_1_31:154999006
is it necessary to code the date/version information into the prefix? shouldn't this just be SNOMEDCT?
also in ticket: https://support.crbs.ucsd.edu/browse/NIF-11604
It should just be SNOMEDCT, we should be able to include the version used in the file header
This issue was moved to monarch-initiative/monarch-disease-ontology#9
currently, ids for SNOMED are formed like:
SNOMEDCT_2010_1_31:154999006
is it necessary to code the date/version information into the prefix? shouldn't this just be SNOMEDCT?
also in ticket: https://support.crbs.ucsd.edu/browse/NIF-11604