Closed cmungall closed 5 years ago
Trying to debug in sg-data, but this isn't giving me any genes?
hmm, I though SG automatically went over equiv nodes?
Anyway querying https://scigraph-data.monarchinitiative.org/scigraph/graph/neighbors/MONDO%3A0019568?depth=1&blankNodes=true&direction=BOTH&entail=false
{
"sub": "HGNC:2209",
"obj": "MONDO:0019568",
"pred": "RO:0002607",
"meta": {
"equivalentOriginalNodeSource": [
"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1289"
],
"isDefinedBy": [
"https://data.monarchinitiative.org/ttl/ctd.ttl"
],
"lbl": [
"is marker for"
],
"equivalentOriginalNodeTarget": [
"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MESH_C536195"
]
}
},
{
"sub": "HGNC:2210",
"obj": "MONDO:0019568",
"pred": "RO:0003303",
"meta": {
"equivalentOriginalNodeSource": [
"http://omim.org/entry/120190"
],
"isDefinedBy": [
"https://data.monarchinitiative.org/ttl/omim.ttl"
],
"lbl": [
"causes condition"
],
"equivalentOriginalNodeTarget": [
"http://omim.org/entry/130010"
]
}
},
this is actually correct, see https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/2210
So it seems either the UI is pulling from a different version of the data OR this is a data bug introduced in going from SG->Solr?
you can see the evidence graphs here
looks like orphanet is the culprit, I think this should be fixed in the next data release
fixed with the new release
See https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/760
However, the xref issues in this ticket don't fully explain:
https://beta.monarchinitiative.org/disease/OMIM:130010#gene
Here we see 3 genes associated. The one with the strongest "seeming" evidence and the most sources is COL5A1 but that's actually wrong, this gene is for EDS1!