Closed ielis closed 3 weeks ago
@ielis It would probably be bettter to have a table with also counts according to mutation category and common variants etc. I will start to work on a viewer.
@ielis @pnrobinson Do we still want this? Or are the counts we show in the viewer currently enough?
I think we will need to revise the way how we model variants and genotypes, but first we must define the specification/requirements.
Let's keep this open for the time being.
I am not sure I understand the issue. If we are talking about a recessive disease, we can have a homozygous variant (biallelic) or two heterozygous variants (each monoallelic). Also, some diseases rarely can have both dominant or recessive inheritance. However, these are rare things and probably we do not want to display counts like this by default.
Yeah, It is not entirely clear to me anymore what was the motivation behind this issue. It may have become stale.
Let me close it.
For a cohort, show counts of the monoallelic and biallelic variants.