Open matentzn opened 8 months ago
Dear @glass-ships, could I kindly ask if you could please take a look at this issue and assess feasibility? Let me know if you feel comfortable tackling this. Thank you!
Hmmm, would this basically entail changing the prefix from WB
to wormbase
in monarch ingest?
@glass-ships essentially yes, but you would have to do this carefully in consultation with Kevin as you may have some "baked in assumptions" somewhere at UI or ETL level about which prefixes you expect.
I'm not convinced that bioregistry is right here. WB:
is how Wormbase submits their data up to the Alliance, and what is displayed on Alliance pages (which Wormbase contributes to the creation of) that link back to wormbase.org. What do you think @sierra-moxon?
I see NCBI and Panther using WormBase
and the GAF files have WB
I am adding WB at least to bioregistry: https://github.com/biopragmatics/bioregistry/pull/1042
We are using the ideosyncractic
WB
.Bioregistry suggests
wormbase:
for the genes, which I think is fair. Can we change that? Basically, this will make the custom prefix map redundant.https://bioregistry.io/registry/wormbase