It turned out that translator needed to use a release with more specific biolink requirements, so I think we should at a minimum include some kind of metadata yaml that gives the biolink version.
I don't know if this can or should overlap with the qc report yaml, on the other hand, I'm not sure what metadata to include besides the date and the biolink version.
@amc-corey-cox maybe this will overlap with dashboard needs? we might want to give the biolink version in the dashboard, and maybe list of sources, list of categories, list of predicates? The qc report yaml is really ingest-centric, for the purpose of QC, and maybe we want a second yaml that is more generally summary of what's in the graph and what data model is used.
It turned out that translator needed to use a release with more specific biolink requirements, so I think we should at a minimum include some kind of metadata yaml that gives the biolink version.
I don't know if this can or should overlap with the qc report yaml, on the other hand, I'm not sure what metadata to include besides the date and the biolink version.
@amc-corey-cox maybe this will overlap with dashboard needs? we might want to give the biolink version in the dashboard, and maybe list of sources, list of categories, list of predicates? The qc report yaml is really ingest-centric, for the purpose of QC, and maybe we want a second yaml that is more generally summary of what's in the graph and what data model is used.