monarch-initiative / monarch-legacy

Monarch web application and API
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
42 stars 37 forks source link

disclaimers #216

Closed nlwashington closed 7 years ago

nlwashington commented 10 years ago

do we need some kind of disclaimer saying that we aren't a physician and the site is provided for research purposes only? i've seen legal c.y.a. language like this on other sites.

harryhoch commented 10 years ago

Seems like that would be a good idea. On Mar 29, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Nicole Washington notifications@github.com wrote:

do we need some kind of disclaimer saying that we aren't a physician and the site is provided for research purposes only? i've seen legal c.y.a. language like this on other sites.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Harry Hochheiser University of Pittsburgh Department of Biomedical Informatics harryh@pitt.edu 412 648 9300

kltm commented 10 years ago

It would be best to actually run it by the legal department (or whoever would best handle it) for the hosting institution, rather than trying to apply somebody else's disclaimer/notice--if push comes to shove, you're going to need that okay from the beginning.

harryhoch commented 9 years ago

Agree with @kltm. NIF and Biogrid (for example), have quite detailed terms of use pages with significant content. This will require some careful thought and consultation with appropriate counsel.

jmcmurry commented 8 years ago

While not the most exciting task, this is really important especially as we move toward more buzz. I am willing to pick up the thread but need to know: A) Who the appropriate general counsel members are to contact at OHSU B) Whether when I speak with OHSU counsel, whether I should advocate that LBL, UPitt (others?) general counsel be summoned simultaneously or in succession. What approach has worked best so far?

Broader "terms of use" are outside the scope of this ticket and may take months to get through. Let's tackle this disclaimer issue first.

@mellybelly please advise. Thanks.

NIF and BioGrid were mentioned, but I think our use case calls for disclaimers closer to those seen on portals like WebMD. We will see what counsel say.