Open cmungall opened 9 years ago
Created very basic association pages, see http://beta.monarchinitiative.org/association/MONARCH:fe2c101594dc486c9e954022746d240a
@kshefchek This doesn't seem to be working on beta or on production; any ideas as to why? Is this just an issue of a non persistent identifier, or is the basic infrastructure no longer working? Also, what are the links (now and envisioned) that get you to an association page?
The page should work; it is most likely an out dated ID. Right now these are not linked from anywhere, but could eventually be linked from any of our data tables on other pages.
is this the ticket for evidence graphs (continuing from #1232)?
it would be good if we could capture the original cypher query used in the meta field (see also https://github.com/monarch-initiative/configs/issues/18).
All our pages are currently object-centric (geme, ontology term, etc). We would like to have an association centric page.
We have these in golr as the id field (e.g
/solr/golr/select/?q=id:bb7ae97d-ab5d-4179-ac0f-1a9151bfc7e7
).Alternately we may wish to show all the sources for any given pairing, e.g.
Opinions on display welcome, but it may simply be the same as the row in the subject/object pages with each column a row. But here we can actually show more in terms of the chain of evidence.
We could directly render the evidence json object as a graph using cytoscape.js (see existing code in labs). @ccondit will add the json objects back into golr, using the bbop-js model with additional info in the metas.
We could also render this as plain html too; e.g. [gene] is association with [disease] via [source, ref], and [disease] is associated with [phenotype] via [ref,source].