cmungall
commented
8 years ago On 6 Nov 2015, at 10:54, Nicole Washington wrote:
the following ontologies are added to our scigraph build. some probably should be added to monarch.owl directly.
- [ ] http://biohackathon.org/resource/faldo.ttl
- [ ] http://evidenceontology.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/eco.owl +1 use obo purl
- [ ] http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/iao.owl need to check it doesn't import old bfo
- [ ] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/monarch-initiative/GENO-ontology/develop/src/ontology/geno.owl need purl from Matt
- [ ] http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ero.owl need to check it doesn't import old bfo
- [ ] http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/pw.owl
- [ ] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jamesmalone/OBAN/master/ontology/oban_core.ttl looks like purls for this will never work, sigh
- [ ] http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/pco.owl what are we using this for?
need to check it doesn't import old bfo
- [ ] http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/xco.owl
- [ ] http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/index.rdf
- [ ] http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
- [ ] http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
note that we were going to import CLO, but it's missing an import so we don't bring it (see #2)
that could be v problematic, the CLO import chain has ancient modules
we don't have written criteria yet for what goes in. We should include anything that we need in a closure (ie that is subj or obj of association)
some things can have potentially weird side effects, need to document these
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/monarch-initiative/monarch-ontology/issues/4
the following ontologies are added to our scigraph build. some probably should be added to monarch.owl directly.
note that we were going to import CLO, but it's missing an import so we don't bring it (see #2)