Open sabrinatoro opened 1 year ago
Note that I didn't find other examples (looking roughly). I will however wait for this to be reviewed and a new exact mapping file to be created before merging, just in case.
@hrshdhgd v. Important, we should have the actual label in the subject and object fields, not the trimmed ones.
I don't do anything to alter the labels. I use it as is. I'll double check this.
I'm not sure where this is coming from but if you look in this file in MONDO and find line 43087, it shows this mapping done. I think this mistake comes from the source.
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0004648> "A degenerative vascular disorder affecting the brain. It is caused by the blockage of the blood supply to the brain. It is manifested with decline of memory and cognitive functions." "NCIT:C34525 MESH:D015140 DOID:8725 ICD9:290.4 UMLS:C0011269 ICD10:F01.5 EFO:0004718 SCTID:429998004 ICD10:F01"
Also in mondo-edit.obo
, line 75855 is xref: ICD10CM:F01.5 {source="DOID:8725"}
DOID:8725
label is vascular dementia
.
https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Codes/F01-F99/F01-F09/F01-/F01.5
This is a problem with the ICDO10CM OWL file we download. But it does not seem to be an issue on their site, so needs looking at.
https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo-ingest/blob/main/src/ontology/lexmatch/unmapped_icd_lex_exact.tsv
2 different ICD codes are mapped to the same Mondo ID. ICD10CM:F01.5 label is actually "Vascular dementia, unspecified severity" Therefore, ICD10CM:F01.5 should probably not be a Mondo:equivalent. We should probably discuss how these "unspecified" should be treated.