Open sabrinatoro opened 1 year ago
note: the omim x-refs are not on the exclusion list.
These are all super new - you don't need to deal with them at all.
Remaining action item:
<!-- https://omim.org/entry/620298 -->
@sabrinatoro @matentzn Just fixed this via: https://github.com/monarch-initiative/omim/pull/94
Sorry about this! There was a missing -B
flag in the github action, so it hasn't actually been re-running, and has been using an old, committed version of omim.ttl
.
We previously have been committing it but perhaps it's also time to remove it from commits, since it's in the release.
Anyway, I checked and the new release does have these new MIMs.
What is the status of this issue?
OMIM:620459 is not in the slurp file. Is this the same issue that still needs to be resolved, or is it a new bug? Thanks!
Just took a look. It's a different bug. Same problem, but different cause. The new cause is https://github.com/monarch-initiative/omim/issues/105. Something appears to have changed in the Python Package Index, I think, which is causing installation failure of Python packages within the GitHub action.
I say this is a GitHub action issue, because I looked at the last successful run on July 16th, and OMIM:620459
doesn't appear there. But I just did a fresh run and it does appear.
I suppose I should bump up the priority of fixing this issue.
For today, I just reran locally and uploaded a new release dated today, so the next time that the mondo-ingest
pipeline is run, this term should appear in the slurp now.
The following DO terms have mapping to OMIM x-ref which are not in Mondo, and not in the omim slurp file Here are some examples: