Closed matentzn closed 3 years ago
MONDO:0005318 'canker sore' has the text def from HPO - I think this is allowable, yes?
Yes! Since we explicitly allow (provenanced definition to migrate over). Made a ticket here, so yes, you can ignore this for now.
Cool - will close this, as these have all been addressed.
Let's think more critically - does canker sore really belong in mondo? If it does, should it really have the same definition? If it does, then we surely should have an equivalence axiom between the two?
Based on past comments from Peter, "I think that canker sore is probably best as an HPO term.", so we should obsolete canker sore from Mondo: https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/1262
Although it is a disorder in NCIt: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols/ontologies/ncit/terms?iri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.obolibrary.org%2Fobo%2FNCIT_C62546
We could use their def instead?
Canker sore is also a disease in UMLS, represented under [C0038363] Aphthous Stomatitis
ROBOT report:
These must be duplicates to classes outside of Mondo (use Protege search to find) MONDO:0005318 IAO:0000115 Oral aphthous ulcers typically present as pain... MONDO:0003085 IAO:0000115 Inflammation of the cornea. MONDO:0007303 IAO:0000115 A rib that is attached to a cervical vertebra.