Closed larrybabb closed 1 year ago
Thanks for reporting this @larrybabb - this was a consequence of a move to use a different annotation property during curation, and failure to update our reporting pipeline, which is all done in #5715, including QC to guard against future mistakes.
The mondo_obsoletioncandidates.tsv file that is provided with each release has 5 columns:
mondo_id, label, comment, issue, obsoletion_date
. For the most part the "issue" column provides a link to the mondo github issue that is the source for the reason for obsoletion. However sometimes, a NIH rarediseases.info site is referenced.It would be very helpful if the
issue
value was always the MONDO issue that was the source behind the obsoletion. For example in the Dec 01.2022 release the recordSeems to have been produced from the mondo issue #5619. It seems like it would be more consistent and logical to provide the mondo issue link under the
issue
column.Is this intentional or a bug? If it is a bug, can we get an estimate on when it might be corrected.