Closed sabrinatoro closed 3 months ago
WRT the sparql query: When adding a lot of obsoletion candidate tag, we run into failing on the ROBOT template merging because a comment already exist (for example). To facilitate this, I (with Nico's help) created a sparql query to identify the candidates which will make the ROBOT merging fail. I thought it would be a good tool to have in the repo for future use. I removed most of the MONDO:ID present in the original query because it doesn't make sense to keep them (the important and stable part of the query is everything else). I was in a hurry and did not explain everything related around this sparql query. Sorry. I hope it makes more sense now.
For "Tab ROBOT_AddObsSubsetTag to add in release 2024-07", should there be comments for all rows in the spreadsheet and therefore a comment: Reason of obsoletion...
property on the Mondo class?
There are only 339 classes with comment: Reason of obsoletion...
, but 352 classes with subset: obsoletion_candidate
.
13 candidates already had a comment, so I had to add the obsoletion-related comment manually (otherwise the ROBOT merge would fail because terms have more than one comment). This is why you see 339 classes with comment: Reason of obsoletion..., but 352 classes with subset: obsoletion_candidate.
The number of obsoletion candidates is more than that this time. If you look at the googlesheet: