Closed maglott closed 4 years ago
@pnrobinson and @cmungall what are your thoughts?
This definitely should not be represented as "MONDO_0003847, inherited genetic disease". I would think that it is probably best to integrate the MONDO data with something like https://www.pharmgkb.org/
Yes, obsolete these. I think the best home is OBA, since these are traits
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:28 AM Peter Robinson notifications@github.com wrote:
This definitely should not be represented as "MONDO_0003847, inherited genetic disease". I would think that it is probably best to integrate the MONDO data with something like https://www.pharmgkb.org/
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/860?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAMMOPF3DWBVM5KJSTGGE3QMNUBFA5CNFSM4I4KV6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEABVZXA#issuecomment-537091292, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMONI4BV73KTS5DDJJZDQMNUBFANCNFSM4I4KV6NQ .
Ontology of Biological Attributes: http://www.obofoundry.org/ontology/oba.html
@maglott are there other terms besides MONDO_0014330 'eculizumab, poor response to' that should be obsoleted and added to OBA instead?
Do you want to make a ticket in OBA for the terms you need? https://github.com/obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology
Thanks!
I think we can make a first pass at these ourselves
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:48 PM Nicole Vasilevsky notifications@github.com wrote:
@maglott https://github.com/maglott are there other terms besides MONDO_0014330 'eculizumab, poor response to' that should be obsoleted and added to OBA instead?
Do you want to make a ticket in OBA for the terms you need? https://github.com/obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology
Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/860?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAMMOLYSRO5UCGIJYNMBVDQMUJLVA5CNFSM4I4KV6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEAGJPUA#issuecomment-537696208, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOOEFOHOUDWBEH5WG4LQMUJLVANCNFSM4I4KV6NQ .
but any help welcome of course!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:50 PM Chris Mungall cjmungall@lbl.gov wrote:
I think we can make a first pass at these ourselves
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:48 PM Nicole Vasilevsky notifications@github.com wrote:
@maglott https://github.com/maglott are there other terms besides MONDO_0014330 'eculizumab, poor response to' that should be obsoleted and added to OBA instead?
Do you want to make a ticket in OBA for the terms you need? https://github.com/obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology
Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/860?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAMMOLYSRO5UCGIJYNMBVDQMUJLVA5CNFSM4I4KV6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEAGJPUA#issuecomment-537696208, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOOEFOHOUDWBEH5WG4LQMUJLVANCNFSM4I4KV6NQ .
@cmungall there are 98 responses listed on this webpage: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/tests/558523/indication/
Should all of these be added to OBA? If yes, I can make a ticket. I am not sure if I have ever edited OBA though. It is all pattern based, right?
do these denote abnormal response, or the general response trait? If former, also belong in HPO? How is this coordinated with loinc2hpo? cc @pnrobinson
We have a request to add a general abnormal response to medication X, still considering this. I am not sure where best to put these terms & worried about combinatorial explosions (even more :-0). This would not be directly connected to LOINC2HPO, which does not include the genetic infos.
For consideration: When ClinVar receives submissions from PharmGKB, there is a parent (unqualified) response to medication X, and then depending on the drug and the metabolic effect, e.g. simvastatin response - Toxicity/ADR simvastatin response - Efficacy https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/medgen/?term=simvastatin
Compare to the terms that Orphanet made obsolete: https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=EN&Expert=240985 https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=EN&Expert=240913
Sorry, I did not read from the top of the thread. Here are more concepts from UMLS and OMIM that we have categorized in part as pharmacologic responses: C1861502|Colchicine resistance|120080| C0750384|Warfarin response|122700| C1860214|Acetophenetidin sensitivity|200300| C1859352|Carbimazole sensitivity|212060| C0878587|Slow acetylator due to N-acetyltransferase enzyme variant|243400| C1838854|Aminoglycoside-induced deafness|580000| C1827409|Disorder due cytochrome p450 CYP2D6 variant|608902| C1836023|CYP2C19-related poor drug metabolism|609535| C3281153|Efavirenz response|614546|
And of course , there are the LOINC codes for function and metabolizer status
Thanks @maglott
@cmungall This is a list of terms that are candidates to be obsoleted from Mondo, and I will create a ticket to request these in OBA:
MONDO_0007348 Colchicine resistance MONDO_0008697 'acetophenetidin sensitivity' MONDO_0008906 Carbimazole sensitivity MONDO_0012294 CYP2C19-related poor drug metabolism MONDO_0012148 'drug metabolism, poor, CYP2D6-related' MONDO_0014330 'eculizumab, poor response to'
Note that anything with 'poor' in the label is out of scope for OBA, as it should be the value-neutral trait. However, you can still make terms for the agnostic form.
Anything with 'poor' is a candidate for HPO, pending Peter's decision on this
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:53 AM maglott notifications@github.com wrote:
For consideration: When ClinVar receives submissions from PharmGKB, there is a parent (unqualified) response to medication X, and then depending on the drug and the metabolic effect, e.g. simvastatin response - Toxicity/ADR simvastatin response - Efficacy
Compare to the terms that Orphanet made obsolete: https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=EN&Expert=240985 https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=EN&Expert=240913
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/860?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAMMOOFS7V5NMKNYIBUQXTQMXFMDA5CNFSM4I4KV6N2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEAHZ4IY#issuecomment-537894435, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOLKM4H74T22M5OPFBTQMXFMDANCNFSM4I4KV6NQ .
Should a category be created for pharmacologic responses?
If these are in scope for MONDO, seems the category could be more specific than MONDO_0003847, inherited genetic disease
Thanks, Donna