Open joeflack4 opened 2 months ago
For now, as of this PR, I'm adding as mondo#omim_included
:
Can you add some examples of what the original data looks like and what it does (or will) look like when it is processed?
Sure. Maybe this is sufficient, but let me know if you're looking for a different kind of example:
OMIM:113600 a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "branchial cleft anomalies" ;
MONDONS:omim_included "branchial cysts" ;
oboInOwl:hasExactSynonym "branchial cleft anomalies" ;
rdfs:comment "This term has one or more labels that end with ', INCLUDED'." .
This is an example of an existing class with MONDONS:omim_included
on an included title.
Hypothetically, if this class also had an included symbol "BC", then it would look like this:
OMIM:113600 a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "branchial cleft anomalies" ;
MONDONS:omim_included "branchial cysts" ;
oboInOwl:hasExactSynonym "branchial cleft anomalies" ;
MONDONS:omim_included "BC" ;
rdfs:comment "This term has one or more labels that end with ', INCLUDED'." .
Background
Originally in #118 we were going to add these as synonyms. However, we realized that we are specifically not adding "included" titles and instead marking them as
mondo#omim_included
. We are currently thinking about what to do, and we may end up treating symbols in the same way.Choices: a.
oio:exactSynonym
b.oio:relatedSynonym
c.oio:closeSynonym
d.mondo#omim_included
I think 'd' for now. If we choose to use a synonym type, then we should also do so for included titles as well. If we were to pick a synonynm type for these, I think would be 'related' or 'close'.
Related
141