Closed joeflack4 closed 2 years ago
This is exactly this issue: #45
Hmm, maybe so. I re-read the issue a couple times, but I don't understand some of what you and Chris are talking about.
I'm not 100% sure if these are the same issue, or related. One reason is because the there is a difference between the problematic OMIM terms mentioned in this issue, and the ones in the issue that you linked. I would imagine that if it was the same issue, then the list of terms would be the same terms.
Also, I just updated the original post. I had accidentally written, for example:
Warning: HGNC symbol 613050.0 was mapped to two different HGNC IDs, FAM90A14 and FAM90A14P. This was unexpected, so this mapping has been removed.
But what I meant to write was:
Warning: MIM# 613050 was mapped to two different HGNC symbols, FAM90A14 and FAM90A14P. This was unexpected, so this mapping has been removed.
This was apparently due to mim2gene.txt
and genemap2.txt
being from different dates. Once I had versions of these that were produced on the same date, I got no inconsistencies. I've updated the code to download a fresh copy of genemap2.txt
, which it wasn't doing before, so the problem is now solved.
In running the new ingest, the following HGNC warnings were produced:
I've reached out to the OMIM people for guidance on what to do about this, whether both of these mappings are valid, only one of them, or possibly neither.
inconsistent hgnc symbols.csv