Closed kirenotneb closed 6 years ago
+1; it occurs to me though that we are leaving the terms on the floor except for download. Do we need a mechanism to report back centrally the verdict of whether all symptoms could be found? Also, this is picky but "Were you" is spelled wrong.
I inadvertently left off the persistence (which depends on the work BCH committed to do) which will still occur automatically when they reach the report page. This includes:
The system now executes the workflow as described in above image. There is no navigation in the UI to return to a previous step, although users can use the back button to navigate their history. From a usability perspective this matches what users would expect and allows them to refine their terms.
ok great thanks
Description
The Phenotypr Body tool allows users to self-identify phenotypic abnormalities using an unconstrained approach for describing their symptoms, enabling them to drive the process. It also must encourage the user to be as complete as possible in identifying symptoms to ensure the most complete representation of any potential phenotypical abnormalities.
User Story
As a user I want to:
Acceptance Criteria