Closed HardenedSteel closed 4 months ago
Built without sensitive environment variables
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 30aeac7c0ee865112e567439062514071b6e0811 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/barolo-time-757cf9/deploys/669aa7b9d184df000829932a |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-2310--barolo-time-757cf9.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
^ updated the commit description
https://deploy-preview-2310--barolo-time-757cf9.netlify.app/resources/roadmap/ LGTM
Thanks! Some initial thoughts:
we also seen an MVP xmr-ltc testnet atomic swap from kayabanerve @ https://bounties.monero.social/posts/112/21-050m-xmr-to-ltc-atomic-swap but im not sure of any projects integrating/actively working on it (early days)
xmr <> ltc has been working via basicswap for a long time. Currently uses adaptor sigs
will likely implement eth and bch swaps as well
tbh XMR-BCH doesn't look very completed to me.
and work on Seraphis not started should i change it to planned?
link the open mrl open research issue
done
FCMP++
done
Cuprate
done
@nahuhh since when? for adding to roadmap
@nahuhh since when? for adding to roadmap
Just saw this. ltc<>xmr has been live on basicswap since dec 2022
august 2023 for bi-directional xmr atomic swaps. if deciding which date to list, i think the august date is likely the better milestone. Before this, the monero holder in atomic swaps had to act as the "taker"
We can get some MRL input on removing tych. That open ccs was refunded to the GF a while ago
edited excerpts without full context from an informal chat in monero lounge regarding layer2's below: (which is being deleted in this PR)
<kayabanerve> [...] FCMP++s enable some PCNs as Seraphis (the protocol) would.
<kayabanerve> So we are indirectly working on those, even if I don't support the enabled instances I know of.
Rucknium mentions cores intentions of making layer 1 scale and "Since 7 years ago, a few papers on Monero payment channels have been published. No production code implementing them AFAIK"
My thoughts on layer2's are that this was probably added because it's a popular buzzword and people bring it up a lot
LWS subaddress support was completed as of Dec 2023
@nahuhh do you have link for it?
https://github.com/vtnerd/monero-lws/commit/b4426b4a74f1ab83f076288c34816447bc1577ba
I spoke with vtnerd to confirm subaddress support
didn't add the commit link, not very useful for the roadmap
The ETH<>XMR atomic swaps should likely move to completed as well. I'm not sure the date. I think May 2023, but need to double check (This is not to contradict @plowsof, but for consistency. If BCH is marked as completed, ETH should be as well.)
eth-xmr swaps are "completed" but the last update in their matrix room was that not many people came forward to test. But this is my unqualified opinion. I think bch-xmr should be listed as also on-going. Last i seen they where working on a monero web wallet. Depends how we define completed : a swap on main/testnet or a working gui/cli that has peers to swap.with which we can link users to.
I'm personally ok with listing both BCH and ETH as completed. I don't believe we waited for a GUI before considering BTC<>XMR as complete, but considered "complete" to imply that there was a functional tool.
bumping this: ETH<>XMR atomic swaps went from prerelease to release in may 2023
Tldr: BCH is marked as completed, so eth should be as well.
The ETH<>XMR atomic swaps should likely move to completed as well.
plowsof:
Depends how we define completed : a swap on main/testnet
this is how id define completed ^. liquidity or consumer grade tooling isn't essential to completion.
I'm personally ok with listing both BCH and ETH as completed. I don't believe we waited for [unstoppableswaps] before considering BTC<>XMR as complete, but considered "complete" to imply that the protocol was functional
At a glance, this is the last "low hanging" change. The rest LGTM
finally