Open mononoken opened 10 months ago
Currently, the owner of a Collection is recorded both in the table owner_id and also by the memberships table role "owner".
This redundancy seems like it should be removed. Could owner_id be removed and ownership be solely recorded under memberships?
Currently, the owner of a Collection is recorded both in the table owner_id and also by the memberships table role "owner".
This redundancy seems like it should be removed. Could owner_id be removed and ownership be solely recorded under memberships?