I would like us to consider the direction of putting the AST builder builder in the safe scope, perhaps under the astBuilder name, or perhaps as makeAstBuilder, analogous to makeLazySlot. We would then have to alter m`` to expose the AST builder under a method, but this would open the door to allowing other quasiparsers to have the same method for exposing their AST builders.
I would like us to consider the direction of putting the AST builder builder in the safe scope, perhaps under the
astBuilder
name, or perhaps asmakeAstBuilder
, analogous tomakeLazySlot
. We would then have to alterm``
to expose the AST builder under a method, but this would open the door to allowing other quasiparsers to have the same method for exposing their AST builders.