We have to define the logic but also decide how it will be represented.
There is no agreement on how to denominate a method from an R6 object created with my_R6$new(), though the method mentioned separately is usually described by $my_method() without a lhs.
Given that an R6 object that behaves as advised by the doc will create an object with a class spelled as its constructor, I think we might take the constructor's name between <> followed by the dollar and method, e.g. : <my_R6>$my_method()
We have to consider public and private, and we'll show them with the same syntax, also $initialize() stays this way, we don't show $new()
We have to define the logic but also decide how it will be represented.
There is no agreement on how to denominate a method from an R6 object created with
my_R6$new(), though the method mentioned separately is usually described by$my_method()without a lhs.Given that an R6 object that behaves as advised by the doc will create an object with a class spelled as its constructor, I think we might take the constructor's name between
<>followed by the dollar and method, e.g. :<my_R6>$my_method()We have to consider public and private, and we'll show them with the same syntax, also
$initialize()stays this way, we don't show$new()