naming consistency

[moodymudskipper]

we've let this slip to move forward but maybe worth going back to this.

xxxing form is natural for a lot of tags, maybe worth trying to fit our non compliant tags in this format ? We can use prefix using when we have nothing better, it sometimes becomes much more verbose but maybe it is still sometimes better ?

• dbg --> debugging
• strictly --> setting_warn ?
• bng --> using_bang
• lbd --> using_lambda
• on_self --> self_referencing
• grp --> grouping_by (grouping is taken by base::grouping)
• rw --> using_rowwise
• safely2, quietly2, possibly2 --> using_safely, using_quietly, using_possibly
• fs --> sequencing
• with_pb --> progressing

maybe useful short version can be aliases so the long version exists to be explicit (e.g. keep lbd AND using_lambda), this might clutter the package with choices that will be regretted later though, so maybe keep those to a minimum at first (only fs ?).

[moodymudskipper]

"sequencing" is a bit of an confusing name, and if we rewrite fs as a proper tag using compose it might make sense to call it composing.

[moodymudskipper]

done