moodymudskipper / tb

IN ~PROGRESS my own take on `[.data.frame`
0 stars 0 forks source link

improving functionals #14

Closed moodymudskipper closed 4 years ago

moodymudskipper commented 5 years ago

taking inspiration from : https://gist.github.com/moodymudskipper/b41262109ef1065cb7c89c9bf351f8fd

We could either use those functions, with !~, or implement !~ "natively" in [.tb.

Problem is then how do we decide the output type ?

Solutions are :

I believe the 2 latter options are the most reasonable so we should start with option 3.

moodymudskipper commented 4 years ago

We went for ~~ and simplify array