mooman219
commented
3 years ago As far as I can tell from reading the code, this is a simplification step (performed while loading a font) which omits details which would not be visible at smaller sizes. Is that correct?
Yes
https://docs.rs/fontdue/0.5.0/fontdue/struct.FontSettings.html#structfield.scale
Related: #60.
?
https://docs.rs/fontdue/0.5.0/fontdue/layout/struct.Layout.html#method.new
Also related: #49. If I wished to render a glyph for multiple sub-pixel positions (e.g. (0, 0) and (0.5, 0) — not RGB sub-pixel rendering)... this isn't supported. Does the "outline simplification" above conflict with supporting this?
Outline simplification is independent from rasterization. Sub-pixel positioning as described is trivial.
This already works in fontdue but I didn't expose it (see: offset_x/offset_y). I'll expose it when I do a pass at cleaning up layout since it'll break everyone with an extra parameter and it has caching implications.
As far as I can tell from reading the code, this is a simplification step (performed while loading a font) which omits details which would not be visible at smaller sizes. Is that correct?
Related: #60.
Also related: #49. If I wished to render a glyph for multiple sub-pixel positions (e.g.
(0, 0)and(0.5, 0)— not RGB sub-pixel rendering)... this isn't supported. Does the "outline simplification" above conflict with supporting this?