Closed mlidbom closed 11 years ago
Yup this is strange, presented like this I don't see any reason for donuts to not contain donuts.
That's a relief.
I was a bit worried that I might have been missing some fundamental part of the design/intended use.
Do you have any idea when a NuGet package with this fixed might be available? I prefer not to repackage dependencies unless I have to. Sorry to bug you like this, but if it will be a while I'd better get cracking on repackaging it for our private NuGet feed. A pre-release would be greatly appreciated if you feel that it is not ready for prime time.
I'm gonna make a prerelease tonight, you took time to make a well documented commit, I can take 5 minutes to push a 1.3.0 beta1 on nuget :)
Great. Thanks a lot :)
prerelease is available on nuget, i'll reauthor the second commit you made in the test project now. This is a downside of a separated subproject...
Yea. That's actually why I did not base this on the latest version of master. I did not have the time to manage multiple pull requests.
Thanks again for the release. Really helps me out :)
Thanks to you :)
We have been scratching our heads trying to get the cache to work with no success until I actually dug into the code. Maybe I'm missing something, but as far as I can tell things are utterly broken when donuts contain donuts. This change makes everything work sanely for us according to my testing so far.