Closed Whale-Street closed 2 years ago
I think we order transactions by height, but maybe we have to order mempool transactions by time or something
unfortunately mempool transactions aren't really "ordered" in any way, but we can maintain the state of what we currently think is in the mempool and add/remove from that to keep an order
Describe The Bug
When sending two subsequent transactions, the first transaction is being displayed second and the second first.
To Reproduce
Send a transaction, then send another. While the transactions are still in the mempool, observe them in a coin's transaction history.
Expected Behavior
They should be in the correct order by time sent.
Screenshots
Tasks For This Bug