Closed lastmeta closed 2 years ago
if you do multiple mempool transactions at hte same time, they're not necessarily in the correct order
send multiple mempool transactions
first in first out
tested on mainnet
sent 2,3,1 and I see 2 3 1 so it should be ordered as 1 3 2
then when it got put in a block it was listed as 1 2 3
it seems this is unsolvable since transactions in a block and in mempool are unordered
Describe The Bug
if you do multiple mempool transactions at hte same time, they're not necessarily in the correct order
To Reproduce
send multiple mempool transactions
Expected Behavior
first in first out
Additional Context
tested on mainnet