@fiestajetsam - I am looking at Section 12 of the WARP draft, and wondering if I understand our point in our draft.
Is it accurate to describe what WARP-04 is doing now, as
describes how raw media will be encapsulated within the protocol itself, where the protocol defines the ancillary data required to decode each media type the protocol supports.
?
If I understand the point, it's that we have to rev the specification, and implementations, in order to add a new package (because implementations that only support Container Format 0x0 for fMP4 don't know what to do with Container Format 0x1), so the distinction we are making seems (to me) to be about whether the protocol specification uses a generic method to tell a receiver how to decode media, rather than whether the protocol specification describes methods itself.
Please let me know what you think, because I'm pretty sure I know what I want to say, unless I'm confused.
@fiestajetsam - I am looking at Section 12 of the WARP draft, and wondering if I understand our point in our draft.
Is it accurate to describe what WARP-04 is doing now, as
?
If I understand the point, it's that we have to rev the specification, and implementations, in order to add a new package (because implementations that only support Container Format 0x0 for fMP4 don't know what to do with Container Format 0x1), so the distinction we are making seems (to me) to be about whether the protocol specification uses a generic method to tell a receiver how to decode media, rather than whether the protocol specification describes methods itself.
Please let me know what you think, because I'm pretty sure I know what I want to say, unless I'm confused.