Add relationship called children to EnumerationType

[acetousk]

This is probably missing and would be useful for not having to do additional entity finds for the EnumerationType entity

[jonesde]

The definition looks good, not sure about the short-alias 'children'. This is following a type many relationship between EnumerationType and Enumeration, ie getting all enum records by type. For type many short-alias values the convention is to use a plural word, singular for type one (and one-nofk). In this case maybe 'enums' would be a more descriptive yet short alias?

When I first saw the PR description with 'children' I was thinking maybe for hierarchical types, but EnumerationType doesn't have that. For what it's worth, when I think of children in a relational data model I usually think of a relationship between records of the same entity, like with parentWorkEffortId and the parent/child relationships with it.

[acetousk]

The definition looks good, not sure about the short-alias 'children'. This is following a type many relationship between EnumerationType and Enumeration, ie getting all enum records by type. For type many short-alias values the convention is to use a plural word, singular for type one (and one-nofk). In this case maybe 'enums' would be a more descriptive yet short alias?

When I first saw the PR description with 'children' I was thinking maybe for hierarchical types, but EnumerationType doesn't have that. For what it's worth, when I think of children in a relational data model I usually think of a relationship between records of the same entity, like with parentWorkEffortId and the parent/child relationships with it.

I changed children to enums.