Closed rexim closed 7 years ago
@morganey-lang if you have any preferences regarding the 0.2.0
please let me know here.
I think in 0.2.0
we should mainly work on performance improvements as well as on refactorings and bug-fixes.
Issues related to performance improvements:
We should also complete the implementation of the Prelude mechanism (#79) in 0.2.0
.
@keddelzz all of the issues you've mentioned are important, but I wouldn't plan all of them for 0.2.0
, because it's much more amount of work comparing to 0.1.0
. And 0.1.0
was just a "simple" packing of std-lib with the fatjar ;)
I'm gonna plan #59, because I already tried it and found out that it may require to heavily refactor the entire codebase. Sound like enough work for a realease. Plus #79 since it should be pretty straightforward.
Thanks for the suggestions!
The goal of 0.1.0 was to deliver std-lib packed with fatjar. We delivered that. We need to set the goal for 0.2.0 now.