search

morphgnt / sblgnt

morphological tagging of the SBL Greek New Testament
120 stars 32 forks source link

πυκνά in Luke 5.33 #9

Open jtauber opened 10 years ago

jtauber commented 10 years ago

Is it the accusative plural neuter of πυκνός (in which case lemma is wrong) or a derived adverb (in which case the part-of-speech is wrong)?

jtauber commented 8 years ago

@emg yet more to discuss :smile:

seumasjeltzz commented 5 years ago

well, it is the acc pl nt., but it's at least common enough that the adverbial usage has it's own LSJ subsection for the adjective, and a separate headword for the adverb. How many times does an adjective need to be used adverbial before it is lexicalised?

jtauber commented 5 years ago

As it's currently represented in MorphGNT, there's a mistake (i.e. it's lemmatised as an adverb but POS-tagged as an adjective). I think it can only be decided syntactically in context.

jtauber commented 5 years ago

If this is a morphological analysis (especially in the "new tag" branch where we care more about the morphological properties than the syntactic ones) we should probably treat it as an adjective. In other words, specify the case, etc in the "new tag" branch even if functionally it's not an "A" POS.

seumasjeltzz commented 5 years ago

Then yes, I'd concur in treating it as as adjective morphologically, despite being syntactically adverbial.