Closed MerlinEgalite closed 8 months ago
Why removing description if it doesn't revert ?
Agree that there is an inconsistency here: we could keep description in the contract and not in the interface, in the same way
ST_ETH
is public and not in the interface
I believe the rationale is: we were forced to add it back when we wanted to comply with Chainlink's interface, but it doesn't make sense for us to have it because we don't want to expose a description string from our adapter The only reason to keep it would be to be "more compliant" with Chainlink, but we don't care
Naming can be changed if needed