Open operoncao opened 2 years ago
I don't have any experience with nanopore reads to date. My guess is if you are able to quantify the 3' UTRs using Salmon then it should work with QAPA.
Thank you very getting back, I tried salmon quant on long reads, the mapping rate is very low around 1.2% .
I think this is salmon issue, I will try other ways
Hi @kcha I think I have manged to get QAPA to work with nanopore, I'm trying to validate it somehow.
Needed to go back a few steps in the pipeline, default salmon mapping-mode gave very low mapping rate so I had to go back to alignment-based mode, but to do this I had to align long reads to the output_sequences.fa
generated by qapa fasta
.
This was followed by aligning the reads using minimap2 this was done by the following commands
minimap2 -ax splice -t 40 output_sequences.fa NanoporeSample1.fastq | samtools view -Sb > QAPA_alignments/NanoporeSample1.bam
followed by some samtooling just incase
samtools sort -@ 40 -T tmp -o QAPA_alignments/NanoporeSample1_sorted.bam QAPA_alignments/NanoporeSample1.bam && samtools index QAPA_alignments/NanoporeSample1_sorted.bam
Salmon quant was then used
salmon quant --ont -p 40 -t output_sequences.fa -l U -a QAPA_alignments/NanoporeSample1_sorted.bam -o salmon_QAPA_Nanopore/NanoporeSample1_salmon
This was finilised with qapa quant
qapa quant --db ensembl_identifiers.txt salmon_QAPA_Nanopore/*/quant.sf > pau_results_Nanopore.txt
Now i'm trying to validate if this has worked just need to understand some of the Scripting for visualisation of the data as in the question here https://github.com/morrislab/qapa/issues/38
I'm also interested in this question regarding using APA with nanopore reads?