Closed dreuter closed 5 years ago
Thanks for looking at it!
async_
is a bit weird for a user-facing parameter, though. What about asynchronous
? slightly more verbose (which is fine as it is not a parameter we type that often anyway), but clearer
Yes I can do that.
My intent was to make it very clear, that this is still the same parameter. To change as little as possible. But maybe it is better to use a descriptive name.
@severin-lemaignan I have updated this pull request to change async
to asynchronous
as suggested.
Great, thank you. Merging it.
async
became a keyword in python 3.7 PEP8 suggests: "single_trailingunderscore: used by convention to avoid conflicts with Python keyword" Thus the change toasync_
.See also: #805