Open molikto opened 8 years ago
Thanks for the example.
I am not sure it should type-check however. The type-checking of a recursive definition
x : A = t
should be
x : A |- t : A (1)
For simplifying the implementation of HIT, we changed this to
x : A = t |- t : A (2)
but we have to think more which one (1) or (2) should be used for recursive definitions.
On 31 Aug 2016, at 06:37, Minghao Liu notifications@github.com wrote:
test1 (t: nat): U = nat
test2 (a: nat): U = (test1 a) where a: (test2 zero) = zero An equivalent problem doesn't type check in Coq
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mortberg/cubicaltt/issues/51, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACrXlGOiACeU7LY5V7eyFNySjW8sFqa1ks5qlQT6gaJpZM4JxOSM.
An equivalent program doesn't type check in Coq