Closed jwdebelius closed 3 years ago
Hmm, not sure what is going on here, I will need to look into the error more carefully. CC @FrederickHuangLin
I think there's an issue with the metadata there - that there is only one label which is what screws things up. But, playing with the data in R, I think there are other ways the data may need to be output.
I think the bigger issue right now is that the QIIME 2 code doesn't support multiple variables because fo the res -> dataframe conversion. I don't know if then you'd want to seperate the output variables into different sheets/tables, or just concatenate all the list variables
I think we can concat all the list variables into a global stats object type. Is that what you are suggesting?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:55 AM Justine Debelius @.***> wrote:
I think there's an issue with the metadata there - that there is only one label which is what screws things up. But, playing with the data in R, I think there are other ways the data may need to be output.
I think the bigger issue right now is that the QIIME 2 code doesn't support multiple variables because fo the res -> dataframe conversion. I don't know if then you'd want to seperate the output variables into different sheets/tables, or just concatenate all the list variables
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mortonjt/q2-ancombc/issues/6#issuecomment-824914092, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA75VXP2BXZTYSHG3NVYO4DTKA2E3ANCNFSM43EYHIHA .
I see two options. One is to create seperate files for each result variable (essentiaally waht we have now) and create a shiny new type. Which then needs a shiny new convereter/parser/visualized.
The other is to coerce labels onto the R list outputs, cbind
the crap out of everything, and then save the tabular output and call it a day.
It may mean needing a seperate visualization if people want to pull/visualize one covariate like a volcano visualization where you can optionally pass a metadata column
I erm have a PR that I think addresses this. It also drops the requirement for taxonomy since you dont actually need taxonomy to run this, and it might be a PITA for people who want to run it on genus level data for something 🤷♀️. I think #7 hits a lot of the issues
I'm closing this since #7 appears to resolve this issue. Feel free to reopen if it doesn't
Using the tutorial, data I tried to run a multivariate command:
I get the following error: