Closed chrisjonesBSU closed 7 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
b20472c
) 92.78% compared to head (e54e18f
) 92.81%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
It looks like the tests in test_gro.py
are failing with unyt v3. If I downgrade to 2.9.5
they pass for me
Yeah, I fixed that unyt issue in this PR https://github.com/mosdef-hub/gmso/pull/770 (https://github.com/mosdef-hub/gmso/pull/770/commits/6a674cec4f8bda5466159f8dae7fa2d7b21bc72e). That PR is just merged, so if you update the branch to main
that should be fixed.
This is a small PR that simplifies the workflow of saving a topology specific xml file by adding a
to_xml
method toTopology
. This method just calls bothToplogy.get_forcefield
andgmso.core.forcefield.to_xml
, so the unit tests don't check for things like consistency of the new XML file since that is already tested intest_forcefield.py
.I think it it will be helpful to have this functionality work as a single step at the
Topology
level.