Closed rmatsum836 closed 4 years ago
If I recall correctly, this is ready to be tested by another user.
I like this example - it's a pretty sophisticated workflow and utilizes other packages like pore-builder and mtools.
setup.py
to work with the pore-builder, but there might be some hand-holding needed to get the mb recipe plugins to work super easilynp.loadtxt('ref_data/numden.txt')
not reference-data
in the notebookBut the notebook itself is complete and functional (I got it to run)
Thanks for running this and catching my dumb mistakes. Definitely weird about the results you're getting though, I'll check this.
So for some reason the dimensions used for the number density calculation were all wrong but it should be fixed now.
soft requirement on https://github.com/rmatsum836/Pore-Builder/pull/18
My GROMACS build is borked on my macbook but I can try running the simulation tomorrow. But initial structure looks good.
Could someone retest this when they have a chance?
Okay I ran the simulation in its entirety this time: I'm not really worried about the simulation/analysis, but we should try to figure out something with these dependencies (mtools and porebuilder) #2
Thanks @uppittu11 for testing this out! I added some markdown cells and cleaned up the number density profile at the end of the notebook. If there are no other comments, I think this is ready to go.
Looks nice to me, thanks for the contribution!
Graphene slit pore example using the
porebuilder
recipe in mBuild. This working example plots the number density profile of water within the slit pore.