mosta17 / embermediamanager

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/embermediamanager
0 stars 0 forks source link

Not downloading .tbns during mass scrape, but downloading on individual manual scrape. #247

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Scrape entire movie database
2. Open XBMC, some fanart / thumbs are missing
3. Open folder containing movie, notice .tbn files are missing for those
movies not showing fanart / thumbs.
4. Open EMM and scrape movie missing fanart / thumb individually, it
downloads the .tbn files and XBMC now displas it.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

As above.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
EMM_r1069_BETA_FULL_x64.zip on Win7 Ultimate 64bit.

Please provide any additional information below.
I can provide a specific list of movies that were doing this if necessary.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by shutchin...@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2009 at 5:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Please provide an error log. (but I think it will be some time-out issue)

Original comment by nadas.bence@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2009 at 6:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Where is the log file placed? /Log ? I have it set to "Log Errors" in Settings 
but it
is not producing an error log on scrape. 

Is there a debug log setting?

Original comment by shutchin...@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2009 at 3:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
After some investigation, I am 99% sure it is not a timeout issue.

Original comment by shutchin...@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2009 at 9:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
lol, and could you please share with us the details of your investigation?

and yes, log file should be there, if it not exists, means that there were not 
any
errors logged. 

Original comment by nadas.bence@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2009 at 11:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I deleted all .jpg, .nfo from the movie folders which were not downloading the 
.tbns
as well as those from a few that were downloading the .tbns

I did a full rescrape and it still did not download the .tbns for the movies 
that
previously did not have them, but it did for those that previously did have 
them.

This suggests it is not a timeout issue.

Also, since there is no error log being created, I would imagine there would be 
no
timeout errors.

Original comment by shutchin...@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2009 at 11:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I am not sure about if there is a log entry for timeouts, so...

Then now please share with those movies, for which you don't have posters 
downloaded
on autoscrape.

Original comment by nadas.bence@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2009 at 11:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Found the issue, which lead to another issue. The issue was that all of these 
movies
had in an older .nfo that was not associated with EMM. However, when you delete 
that
.nfo and "Update Library" via EMM it does not recognize that the .nfo (or any 
other
file from a folder for that matter) has been deleted. Therefore, when it 
scrapes, it
does not rescrape properly. 

To accomplish a proper rescrape after deleting files from a folder for which EMM
previously downloaded stuff is to select all movies in the list in EMM and 
"Refresh"
(F5). It then will recognize there are no .nfo, fanart, thumbs etc. in the 
folder and
on rescrape, will then rescrape properly.

Original comment by shutchin...@gmail.com on 15 Dec 2009 at 12:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
This is not an issue, but by design. 
In case EMM would always reload all the info for all the movies continously, EMM
would be so slow on a larger movie collection to impossible to work with.

BTW there is a "reload all movies" in tools menu. (This operation shouldn't 
happen
frequently in case of daily use)

Original comment by nadas.bence@gmail.com on 15 Dec 2009 at 6:01

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by nadas.bence@gmail.com on 19 Dec 2009 at 9:03