why name of repo is different of name at README "Tic Tac Toe Game"

[mostafa-hashhash]

@MahmoudMabrok the source code is for the tic tac toe game, but the purpose of the repo is to practice the CI in github actions

[github-learning-lab[bot]]

That wasn't the test name I expected, but that's alright. If you typed something slightly different than what I looked for that may explain it.

I expected one of the following test names:

• Initializes with two players
• Starts the game with a random player
• Sets the current player to be whoever it is not

Let's keep going anyway!

[github-learning-lab[bot]]

Reading failed logs

One of the failing tests is: Initializes with two players. If you dig deeper into the logs, you may notice these results in particular:

  ● Game › Game › Initializes with two players

    expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality

    Expected: "Nate"
    Received: "Bananas"

      12 |     it('Initializes with two players', async () => {
      13 |       expect(game.p1).toBe('Salem')
    > 14 |       expect(game.p2).toBe('Nate')
         |                       ^
      15 |     })
      16 | 
      17 |     it('Initializes with an empty board', async () => {

      at Object.toBe (__test__/game.test.js:14:23)

This tells us that a unit test has been written that names the two players Salem and Nate, and then checks if that name sticks. However, we get :banana: Bananas instead of Nate! How did this happen?

To find out, it may help to know it's common practice to name test files the same as the code file they are testing, but with a .test.js extension. Therefore, we can assume that the test result from game.test.js is caused by a problem in game.js. I'll point it out below.

Make the changes suggested below. I'll respond when the workflow runs.

---

Actions workflow not running? Click here

When a GitHub Actions workflow is running, you should see some checks in progress, like the screenshot below.  If the checks don't appear or if the checks are stuck in progress, there's a few things you can do to try and trigger them: - Refresh the page, it's possible the workflow ran and the page just hasn't been updated with that change - Try making a commit on this branch. Our workflow is triggered with a `push` event, and committing to this branch will result in a new `push` - Edit the workflow file on GitHub and ensure there are no red lines indicating a syntax problem