I think we should mention when referring to Figure 10 that we compare the ITIC/GEMC/GCMC results with REFPROP just so that the values have a common baseline. In the review you say " we compare deviations from REFPROP values as a baseline to make the magnitudes of the discrepancies more clear", I think this should be in the manuscript.
I also think it would greatly help reduce confusion if we remove the REFPROP lines from Figure 11 altogether. And the black points that are critical points should be from literature simulations, not REFPROP.
For example, here the TIP4P results show a discrepancy between Tc with ITIC and experiment. We should really show that there is even a discrepancy between ITIC Tc and simulation, because of Issue #23 .
@mostafa-razavi @jrelliottoh
I think we should mention when referring to Figure 10 that we compare the ITIC/GEMC/GCMC results with REFPROP just so that the values have a common baseline. In the review you say " we compare deviations from REFPROP values as a baseline to make the magnitudes of the discrepancies more clear", I think this should be in the manuscript.
I also think it would greatly help reduce confusion if we remove the REFPROP lines from Figure 11 altogether. And the black points that are critical points should be from literature simulations, not REFPROP.
For example, here the TIP4P results show a discrepancy between Tc with ITIC and experiment. We should really show that there is even a discrepancy between ITIC Tc and simulation, because of Issue #23 .