search

mostafa-razavi / ITIC-paper

0 stars 0 forks source link

Should we still have "T,P" and "T,rho" as subscripts in Eq.(1)? #45

Open mostafa-razavi opened 5 years ago

mostafa-razavi commented 5 years ago

@jrelliottoh This what we have in the beginning of Section2:

image

@ramess101 believes we should remove "T,P" and "T,rho" subscripts, since they are implied in (T,P) and (T,rho) format. Since Dr Elliott specifically asked for including these subscript, I was wondering if we should keep them or remove them?

ramess101 commented 5 years ago

Is it not overly redundant to have both?

On Wednesday, April 3, 2019, mostafa-razavi notifications@github.com wrote:

@jrelliottoh https://github.com/jrelliottoh This what we have in the beginning of Section2:

[image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16358113/55519320-54fb5380-5645-11e9-8ee8-1160b5a6d3d2.png

@ramess101 https://github.com/ramess101 believes we should remove "T,P" and "T,rho" subscripts, since they are implied in (T,P) and (T,rho) format. Since Dr Elliott specifically asked for including these subscript, I was wondering if we should keep them or remove them?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mostafa-razavi/ITIC-paper/issues/45, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWUvhAivn3TKNyH3xydYWX5IuA5TK8WEks5vdTgzgaJpZM4cboJa .