Open wzzydezy opened 4 years ago
Dear Yang Zhou Thanks for your comment and interesting to my paper. You are speaking about the quality of output images or the time of process? And you are going to fuse the lytro-03 multi-focus images or any other special images?
Dear author Thanks for your reply to my question. I used your "ECNN_trained_network_wights.pth" and model to fuse the source image "flower" , and input patch size is 32. But the fusion result is different with your result of your paper.
Dear Yang Zhou Many thanks for your comment. I just checked it. Yes, you are right. I found a little problem in the code and pre-trained. I will update all of them as soon as possible. Also, I will put the source code of my other paper of HCNN.
Dear author Thanks for your answers. I'm looking forward to your updation of ECNN.
Dear author,
Have you updated your model?
Thanks!
Dear Chui Kong I am not the author of ECNN, but I found that the model of ECNN have been updated in github.
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "mostafaaminnaji/ECNN" @.>; 发送时间: 2021年4月23日(星期五) 晚上7:02 @.>; @.**@.>; 主题: Re: [mostafaaminnaji/ECNN] Why the performance of a multi-focus images obtained with your trained model is not good? (#1)
Dear author,
Have you updated your model?
Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Dear Chui Kong,
Sorry for the late reply. Yes, There was a problem that Yang Zhou (wzzydezy) reported to me. Therefore, I found it and updated the code. Date of update: 29 April 2020
Please let me know if there are any other problem or question.
Regards, Mostafa Amin-Naji
Why the performance of a multi-focus images obtained with your trained model is not good?